One way the movie could connect is that the chemical attack was used by the military against the original Cloverfield monster. So if that detail remains unchanged, there are still a couple of ways that plot might relate back to the original Cloverfield. It was originally called The Cellar, and then code-named Valencia, and the threat outside the bunker was said to be caused by a chemical attack. Something else to consider is that this movie wasn't always related to Cloverfield. He doesn't seem to be mincing his words when he says that, so I have to believe that there is some kind of actual monster besides the people. And let's not forget that there's a third person, played by Matt Vairo, whose lack of lines and scenes in the trailers could be hiding his true monstrous nature.īut operating under the belief that the film's "monsters" are really just people is ignoring what Abrams has said about the movie having a literal, other-worldly monster. The trailers definitely look like John Goodman's crazy doomsday-prepper character is the bad guy, but viewers could certainly have the rug pulled out from under them by seeing the apparent protagonist, played by Mary Elizabeth Winstead, instead become the "monster". So what is it?Īs I already stated, most of the theories surrounding the new film think that "monster" is being thrown around metaphorically, and that the only monsters in the movie are human ones. However, he also stipulates that it's not the same monster from Cloverfield, nor is it what he thinks fans are expecting. Abrams admitted to EW that the movie does feature an actual monster, and that monster is "not of this natural Earth". While this premise has lead some fans to believe that the only monsters in the film are the humans themselves, producer J.J. The focus seems to be on the three human characters in the film who are at odds over being trapped in a bunker together, with the threat of some unknown presence outside the bunker that could potentially kill them. But now with the film's pseudo-sequel, 10 Cloverfield Lane, being even stingier with the details than its predecessor, fans are extremely curious about what kind of monster is in 10 Cloverfield Lane.įrom the movie's trailers, it isn't even clear if 10 Cloverfield Lane has any monsters in it at all. Once the film screened, viewers got a good look at the monster without ever really learning where it came from, but it was pretty easily categorized as being in the style of a classic Japanese Kaiju like Godzilla. The film's marketing was decidedly vague, but a few things were evident: It was a found footage horror film that depicted New York City being destroyed by some kind of giant monster. When the movie Cloverfield came out in 2008, a lot of theater-goers didn't know what to expect.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |